Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Alfred J. CISNEROS, Appellant, v. A.C. CAVELL, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rock

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

A Pennsylvania court confiscated as contraband under state law $505.00 found in plaintiff's possession when he was apprehended forty minutes after he had escaped from a Pennsylvania prison. The Superior Court of Pennsylvania affirmed, Com. v. Cisneros, 213 Pa. Super. 746, 246 A.2d 895 (1968), and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied allocatur.

In his instant civil rights action, plaintiff contends that the stated confiscation deprived him of his property in violation of Section 1983, 42 U.S.C.A. The District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania dismissed plaintiff's Complaint on the ground that it failed to set forth a cause of action upon which relief could be granted, and this appeal followed.

On review of the record we find no error.

Standing alone, an action for damages for the taking of personal property or for the recovery of personal property does not lie under Section 1983. Urbano v. Calissi, 384 F.2d 909, 910-911 (3rd Cir. 1967), cert. den. 391 U.S. 925, 88 S.Ct. 1824, 20 L.Ed.2d 664 (1968); Howard v. Higgins, 379 F.2d 227, 228 (10th Cir. 1967). To the same effect see Eisen v. Eastman, 421 F.2d 560, 566 (2d Cir. 1969).

The Order of the District Court dismissing the Complaint will be affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CISNEROS v. CAVELL
(Jan 11, 1971)