AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

TREO ENTERPRISES, Appellant, v. JOSEPH D. O'NEILL et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

In a real property mortgage foreclosure action, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated August 17, 1970, which (1) granted a motion by defendants O'Neill to open their default in answering the complaint and to permit them to serve an answer and (2) stayed the appointed Referee from computing pursuant to a previous order. Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. In this record there is no adequate showing by defendants O'Neill of a satisfactory excuse for their default or a meritorious defense to the action (General Obligations Law, § 5-521, subd. 1; Matter of Waldman, 32 A.D.2d 780, affd. 25 N.Y.2d 677; General Phoenix Corp. v. Cabot, 300 N.Y. 87; Salvin v. Myles Realty Co., 227 N.Y. 51; Elias v. Schwartz, 22 Misc.2d 129; Koppell v. McNeil, 21 Misc.2d 237; Margulis v. Messinger, 34 Misc.2d 699, 702; Leader v. Dinkler Mgt. Corp., 20 N.Y.2d 393; Hoffman v. Nashem Motors, 20 N.Y.2d 513; Hirsch v. Buono Tire Co., 29 A.D.2d 545, affd. 22 N.Y.2d 930). Hence, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to open their default (CPLR 5015; Bouxsein v. Bialo, 35 A.D.2d 523; Krebs v. Raborg, 30 A.D.2d 520; Hurley v. Reoux, 29 A.D.2d 789; Koppell v. McNeil, supra). Munder, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Shapiro, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TREO ENTERPRISES v. O'NEILL
(Jan 25, 1971)