Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald B. RENDLEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

Rendleman was convicted and sentenced for the unlawful possession of marijuana under § 54-7-13 N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 8, pt. 2), known as the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act. Rendleman appealed. We reverse.

This case falls directly within State v. Riley, 82 N.M. 235, 478 P.2d 563 (Ct.App.) decided December 11, 1970, in which § 54-7-14 of the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act was held inapplicable, and § 54-5-14 N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 8, pt. 2), a special act, was held operative.

The conviction and sentence are reversed. The cause is remanded with instruction to vacate the conviction judgment and sentence, and dismiss the charge under which Rendleman was prosecuted.

It is so ordered.

WOOD and HENDLEY, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. RENDLEMAN
(Feb 12, 1971)