Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTH FLORIDA, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. CITY OF HALLANDALE, FLORIDA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. CLIFTON MEEKINS ET AL., PETITIONERS,

PER CURIAM.

The District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, having certified to us that its decision in the cases of City of Hallandale v. Meekins et al., and City of Hallandale v. Investment Corporation of South Florida (Fla.App. 1970), 237 So.2d 318, passes upon a question of great public interest, we accepted jurisdiction for review pursuant to Article V, Section 4(2) of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A.

After hearing oral argument and carefully reviewing the briefs and the record, we have come to the conclusion that the decision of the District Court is correct and we adopt it as the decision of this Court. The writ, therefore, is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C.J., and ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

CARLTON, J., dissents.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

INVESTMENT CORP. OF S. FLA. v. CITY OF HALLANDALE
(Mar 17, 1971)