Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Mitchell v. Dennison et ux., Appellants.

OPINION PER CURIAM, March 18, 1971:

Order affirmed on the authority of Ehnes v. Wagner, 388 Pa. 102, 130 A.2d 171 (1957); Ahrens v. Goldstein, 376 Pa. 114, 102 A.2d 164 (1954); Reidlinger v. Cameron, 287 Pa. 24, 134 A. 418 (1926). See, also, Stark v. Breen, 435 Pa. 20, 24, 255 A.2d 115 (1969).

Mr. Chief Justice BELL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Mr. Justice COHEN took no part in the decision of this case.

Mr. Justice ROBERTS dissents for the reasons set forth in Emperee v. Meyers, 440 Pa. 430, 437, 269 A.2d 731, 734 (1970) (dissenting opinion). See, also, Shuchman, Judgment Notes § 48.5 (1961).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MITCHELL v. DENNISON ET UX
(Mar 18, 1971)