MERCADANTE v. CITY OF PATERSON, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Abram A. Lebson argued the cause for the appellants ( Messrs. Lebson Prigoff, attorneys). Mr. Joseph L. Conn, City Counsel, argued the cause for the respondents ( Messrs. Joseph A. LaCava and Willian A. Feldman, on the brief).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Abram A. Lebson argued the cause for the appellants ( Messrs. Lebson Prigoff, attorneys). Mr. Joseph L. Conn, City Counsel, argued the cause for the respondents ( Messrs. Joseph A. LaCava and Willian A. Feldman, on the brief).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

THOMAS M. MERCADANTE AND MARIO OPROMOLLO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN BEHALF OF ALLOTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE CITY OF PATERSON, AMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND THE BOARD OF POLICEAND FIRE COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF PATERSON, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed by Judge Mountain in the Chancery Division, 111 N.J. Super. 35 (1970).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.