Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Young, Appellant, v. Philadelphia School District.

OPINION PER CURIAM, April 22, 1971:

Judgment affirmed. See, Carlo v. Scranton, 319 Pa. 417, 179 A. 561 (1935).

Mr. Justice ROBERTS dissents for the reasons most recently noted in Smeltz v. Copeland, 440 Pa. 224, 226, 269 A.2d 466, 468 (1970) (dissenting opinion) and once again urges that the unwise and unjust doctrine of governmental immunity be abolished.

Mr. Justice POMEROY dissents for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in Laughner v. Allegheny County, 436 Pa. 572, 576, 261 A.2d 607 (1970).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

YOUNG v. PHILA. SCHOOL DISTRICT
(Apr 22, 1971)