Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Peter ARIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BIG TEN TAXI CORPORATION, Employers Ser

PER CURIAM:

Peter Aris has appealed from the district court's dismissal of his petition for review of an order of the Florida Supreme Court denying certiorari. The district court correctly held that it lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter of the suit. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331 et seq., 1257(3); Iacaponi v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, W.D.Pa. 1966, 258 F. Supp. 880, 884, affirmed 379 F.2d 311, cert. denied 1968, 389 U.S. 1054, 88 S.Ct. 802, 19 L.Ed.2d 849. The order appealed from is due to be and is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ARIS v. BIG TEN TAXI CORPORATION
(May 4, 1971)