Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry MILLER, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

PER CURIAM:

The sole question presented on this appeal is whether or not the provisions of Section 5861(d) and (i) of Title 26, United States Code, violated the appellant's constitutional rights against self-incrimination. The identical question was presented to this court in the case of Piper v. United States, 443 F.2d 371, in which this court upheld the constitutionality of these provisions of the National Firearms Act.

For the reasons set forth in Piper v. United States, the judgment of the district court is hereby affirmed.

See United States v. Freed, et al., 401 U.S. 601, 91 S.Ct. 1112, 28 L.Ed.2d 356; Coleman v. United States, 5 Cir., 1971, 441 F.2d 1132; United States v. Matthews, 5 Cir., 1971, 438 F.2d 715; United States v. Ramsey, 5 Cir., 1970, 429 F.2d 565.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. MILLER
(May 7, 1971)