AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

BARBIZON ELECTRIC CO., INC., Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on January 21, 1971, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of striking therefrom the decretal paragraph which grants defendant's cross motion to dismiss the complaint, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Since the court granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment and declared the rights of the parties, it was error to direct a dismissal of the complaint. (See Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N.Y.2d 317, 334; New York Sporting Arms Assn. v. City of New York, 31 A.D.2d 793, and cases cited therein.)

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Capozzoli, Markewich, Nunez and Eager, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARBIZON ELEC. CO., INC. v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(May 11, 1971)