AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

FILTERITE CORPORATION, a body corporate of the State of Maryland, Appellant, v. TATE ENGINEERING, INC., and the Carborundum Company, Appellees.

PER CURIAM:

Filterite Corporation, assignee of United States Letters Patent No. 3,356,226, brought this action alleging infringement of its patent. The District Court, 318 F. Supp. 584, held the patent valid, but not infringed because of differences between the method of construction of the accused filter units and the specifications of the patent claim. Upon careful consideration of the record, the briefs, and oral arguments, we affirm the judgment of the District Court.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FILTERITE CORPORATION v. TATE ENGINEERING, INC
(May 27, 1971)