Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In re JAKE W. PRATT on Habeas Corpus.

MEMORANDUM CASE

OPINION

THE COURT.

We treat the petition in the above-entitled proceeding as an application to recall the remittitur in People v. Pratt, 2 Crim. 9718. The proceeding is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Four, with directions to recall its remittitur, vacate its judgment to the extent it affirms the judgment in Los Angeles County Superior Court case No. 238805, and redetermine petitioner's appeal therein in light of People v. Daniels, 71 Cal.2d 1119 [ 80 Cal.Rptr. 897, 459 P.2d 225], People v. Mutch, 4 Cal.3d 389 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 721, 482 P.2d 633], and People v. Timmons, 4 Cal.3d 411 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 736, 482 P.2d 648]. To facilitate the proper disposition of the appeal we vacate so much of our order in In re Pratt, 66 Cal.2d 154 [ 56 Cal.Rptr. 895, 424 P.2d 335], as sets aside petitioner's robbery sentence.

Sullivan, J., did not participate.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE PRATT
(May 28, 1971)