Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

REYNOLDS v. CLARE COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION

DANHOF, J.

Plaintiff was injured in an accident on September 23, 1967, allegedly caused by a defective highway. The highway was within defendant's jurisdiction, and on October 5, 1967, plaintiff filed a notice of his injuries and intent to hold defendant liable. The notice was within the form required by the statute in force at that time, MCLA § 691.1404 (Stat Ann 1969 Rev 3.996[104]), in all respects save one. It was not verified.

On January 20, 1969, the plaintiff commenced this action. Defendant moved for accelerated judgment on the grounds that the notice had not been verified. The trial court granted the motion and the plaintiff has appealed.

This case is controlled by Kustasz v. City of Detroit (1970), 28 Mich. App. 312. In Kustasz it was held that when the only defect in the notice is the lack of verification the statute has been substantially complied with and accelerated judgment is improper.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

All concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

REYNOLDS v. CLARE CTY. ROAD COM
(Jun 23, 1971)