Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. EDWARD WARD.

TATE, Justice.

This appeal is from the trial court's denial of a motion to re-sentence the defendant to life imprisonment.

The defendant had previously been sentenced to death. See 246 La. 766, 167 So.2d 359 (1964). Such sentence was set aside on collateral review, for reasons not here pertinent.

By a plea of mootness, our attention is called to the circumstance that, following the trial court denial of the motion, the defendant's death sentence was commuted to a term of ten years and six months.

The plea is well founded. The courts will not rule on questions of law which become moot, since their decree will serve no useful purpose and can give no practical relief. Spinato v. Lowe, 239 La. 604, 119 So.2d 480 (1960); State v. Melerine, 238 La. 847, 116 So.2d 689 (1960). The defendant has already received by executive clemency the relief sought by these proceedings; therefore, the question presented is moot.

For these reasons, the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. WARD
(Jun 28, 1971)