Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SCOTT PROPERTIES, INC. v. LAWSON et al.

DEEN, Judge.

The appellant enumerates error on the judgment of the trial court, after hearing evidence, on the grounds that it is contrary to the evidence, without evidence to support it, against the weight of the evidence, and contrary to law and the principles of justice and equity. All these grounds invoke a consideration of the evidence presented on the trial in which the plaintiff sought to recover alleged earned but unpaid sale commissions in the sum of $14,891.38 and lost profits in the sum of $56,000 due to a sale of the property by the defendant without protection of the plaintiff's rights under the contract as exclusive selling agent of cemetery lots. The appellant did not specify a transcript of the evidence and none appears in the record on appeal. There is accordingly no question presented which can be passed on by this court. Seaton v. Redisco, 115 Ga. App. 80 ( 153 S.E.2d 728); Commercial Nat. Bank of Cedartown v. Moore Ford Co., 121 Ga. App. 424 ( 174 S.E.2d 201). Judgment affirmed. Bell, C. J., and Pannell, J., concur.

SUBMITTED JUNE 1, 1971 — DECIDED JULY 2, 1971.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCOTT PROPERTIES INC. v. LAWSON
(Jul 2, 1971)