Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Mel

PER CURIAM:

After full consideration of the briefs and the argument of counsel, we find no error in the proceedings resulting in the appellant's conviction for bank robbery ( 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113).

Since concurrent sentences were imposed on the three counts of the indictment, we remand the case for imposition of a single sentence. United States v. Retolaza, 4 Cir., 398 F.2d 235; United States v. Spears, 4 Cir., 442 F.2d 424.

Affirmed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. BROWN
(Jun 30, 1971)