Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. PEDRO BELTRAND, Respondent, and LOUIS J. LEFKOWITZ, Attorney-General of the State of New York, Inter

Per Curiam.

There was no proof, on the preliminary hearing, of loitering by defendant for any appreciable period of time. Hence, the testimony was insufficient factually to establish the conjunctive elements of subdivision 6 of section 240.35 Penal of the Penal Law. It is therefore unnecessary to deal with defendant's argument that the statute is unconstitutional ( People v. Schanbarger, 24 N.Y.2d 288; Rescue Army v. Municipal Ct., 331 U.S. 549, 569).

The order should be affirmed.

Concur — LUPIANO, J.P., MARKOWITZ and GOLD, JJ.

Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BELTRAND
(Jul 8, 1971)