AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Jay LAMARCHE, indi v. dually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,

PER CURIAM:

Jay Lamarche appeals from orders of the district court denying motions (1) to proceed in forma pauperis, and (2) to maintain his suit as a class action. We determine that under the circumstances present neither order is a final decision appealable under Title 28, U.S.C. § 1291, nor an interlocutory order appealable under Title 28, U.S.C. § 1292. The appeal is accordingly ordered dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Caceres v. International Air Transport Association, 2 Cir. 1970, 422 F.2d 141; City of New York v. International Pipe Ceramics Corporation, 2 Cir. 1969, 410 F.2d 295; Walsh v. City of Detroit, 6 Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 226; Eisen v. Carlisle and Jacquelin, 2 Cir. 1966, 370 F.2d 119; Gomez v. United States, 5 Cir. 1957, 245 F.2d 346.

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LAMARCHE v. SUNBEAM TELEVISION CORPORATION
(Aug 9, 1971)