Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

DILLON v. S.S. KRESGE COMPANY.

MEMORANDUM OPINION. The complaint alleged that plaintiff, Ethel Dillon, while pregnant and employed at defendant's store, contracted the disease rubella because of defendant's negligence in failing to maintain sanitary conditions. As a result, the child, plaintiff Reginald Dillon, suffered serious and permanent injuries.

Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment based upon Newman v. City of Detroit (1937), 281 Mich. 60, and Marlow v. Krapek (1969), 20 Mich. App. 489, which decisions denied recovery under these facts. On November 23, 1970, the Wayne Circuit Judge entered an order for summary judgment of dismissal.

In light of the Supreme Court's decision in Womack v. Buchhorn (1971), 384 Mich. 718, we reverse and remand for a trial on the merits.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DILLON v. S.S. KRESGE COMPANY
(Aug 26, 1971)