Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CRAWFORD v. THE STATE.

HALL, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for voluntary manslaughter and from the denial of his motion for new trial. He testified that the victim, his common law wife, had pulled a switchblade on him during an argument and that he shot at the floor to frighten her, not realizing until later that he had killed her.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the court erred in refusing to admit testimony from a defense witness that the deceased habitually carried a knife. Not only does Georgia law preclude the proving of general character for violence by specific acts ( Campbell v. State, 222 Ga. 570 ( 151 S.E.2d 132)), but the whole issue is irrelevant here. Defendant's own testimony shows that he did not shoot because he was afraid she would produce a weapon he believed she carried, but because he actually saw the knife in her hands.

Judgment affirmed. Eberhardt and Whitman, JJ., concur.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 17, 1971 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1971.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CRAWFORD v. STATE
(Sep 28, 1971)