Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In re Maude I. BARNES v. Tony BURKE. Ex parte Maude I. Barnes.

SIMPSON, Justice.

We granted certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case, 47 Ala. App. 253, 253 So.2d 46. Having studied the entire record, we conclude that the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals should be affirmed. However, we consider it appropriate to observe that by this opinion we do not necessarily indicate our approval of all the language used in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals.

Affirmed.

LAWSON, MERRILL, HARWOOD, BLOODWORTH, MADDOX and McCALL, JJ., concur.

HEFLIN, C. J., and COLEMAN, J., dissent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARNES v. BURKE
(Sep 30, 1971)