AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of LOUIS M. NICOTINA (Admitted as LOUIS NICOTINA), an Attorney, Respondent. ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Petitioner.

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice in this Department on February 10, 1941. He was charged with converting to his own personal use $5,000 which he was holding in escrow for a client pursuant to a contract of sale, and $6,409.70, being the proceeds of six promissory notes collected by him for his client. No part of said sums has ever been received by respondent's client.

Respondent failed to file an answer to the charge; did not appear to defend himself before the Referee and did not submit any papers on this application to confirm the Referee's report. "Such inaction is not only construed to constitute an admission of the charges but also an indifference to the consequences of an adverse determination" ( Matter of Schner, 5 A.D.2d 599, 600).

The evidence amply sustains the charges and the report of the Referee is confirmed. Respondent should be disbarred. ( Matter of Leyton, 30 A.D.2d 152; Matter of Turk, 25 A.D.2d 255.)

STEVENS, P.J., CAPOZZOLI, McGIVERN, STEUER and TILZER, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred effective November 19, 1971.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF NICOTINA
(Oct 19, 1971)