AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

FARAH MANUFACTURING COMPANY ET AL., PETITIONER-CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT-CROSS-PETITIONER. EL PASO DISTRICT JOINT BOARD, AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, PETITIONER,

PER CURIAM:

There is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board's conclusion that the company violated Sections 8(a)(1) and (3) of the Act by interrogating and then discharging an employee, and by promulgating and maintaining plant rules prohibiting solicitation, distribution and access to other areas, Universal Camera Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951), and it appears that the Board did not improperly apply the standards set forth in N.L.R.B. v. Babcock Wilcox Co., 351 U.S. 105, 76 S.Ct. 679, 100 L.Ed. 975 (1956), in determining that the company did not violate Section 8(a)(1) of the Act by denying non-employee organizees access to its premises.

Enforced.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FARAH MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. N.L.R.B
(Oct 13, 1971)