Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RICHARD C. PAULINE, PETITIONER, v. CHARLES F. BORER AND THE FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS.

MANN, Judge.

Pauline, as listing broker, was advised by a saleslady for another broker in a multiple listing system that their customer was willing to pay $32,000, or, if necessary, $33,000, for the property of Mr. and Mrs. Staples. Pauline's saleslady had procured an offer of $30,000 and talked with Staples on the telephone. Pauline picked up the phone and talked with Staples but did not advise him of the higher offer although he knew of it. Staples sent a telegraphed acceptance of the $30,000 offer. These findings are supported by competent substantial evidence and support the suspension of Pauline's license for one year. Pauline had a duty to disclose the higher offer. See Singer v. M. Grant Inc., Fla.App. 1963, 151 So.2d 52; Anno., 7 A.L.R.3d 693.

Certiorari denied.

PIERCE, C.J., and McNULTY, J., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PAULINE v. BORER
(Nov 15, 1971)