Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DUVALL v. DUVALL.

HALL, Presiding Judge.

Defendant in a suit for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution appeals from the order striking parts of her answer pursuant to Code Ann. § 81A-112 (f) (redundant, immaterial, impertinent or scandalous). The order was certified for immediate review.

Defendant contends that by striking these sections the court has deprived her of the opportunity to adequately defend against the harsh allegations of the complaint. We disagree. It is sufficient to say that the court did not abuse its discretion in ordering certain parts stricken. The remainder of the answer adequately covers all of the plaintiff's allegations.

Judgment affirmed. Bell, C. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur. Whitman, J., not participating because of illness.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 20, 1971 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 15, 1971.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DUVALL v. DUVALL
(Nov 15, 1971)