QUILLIAN, Judge.
The appellant was convicted of burglary. He filed an appeal and the case is here for review. Held:
1. The appellant contends it was error to fail to grant his motion for a continuance on the ground of the absence of a material witness. The record shows: that the appellant was represented by counsel for several weeks prior to trial; that the appellant failed to inform his counsel that the presence of the witness was necessary and material to his defense; that no subpoena was issued for the witness by the appellant or his attorney. The denial of the motion for a continuance was not error. Code § 27-415; Coker v. State, 87 Ga. App. 411 (1) ( 74 S.E.2d 12).
2. The remaining enumerations of error are without merit.
Judgment affirmed. Jordan, P. J., and Evans, J., concur.
SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 2, 1971 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 22, 1971.