Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, v. MICHAEL L. MOROSIN, APPELLANT.

Sentences: Appeal and Error: Statutes. Unless an abuse of discretion appears, we will not disturb a sentence within statutory limits.

SMITH, J.

An information charged that defendant knowingly had concealed a stolen motorcycle with the intent to defraud the owner. Upon a plea of guilty the district court sentenced him to imprisonment for 2 to 3 years. On appeal defendant complains that the sentence was excessive. The governing statute, section 28-522, R.R.S. 1943, prescribed imprisonment for not less than 1 year nor more than 10 years.

We may reduce a sentence when in our opinion it is excessive, and we are under a duty to render such sentence as the evidence may warrant. See 29-2308, R. R. S. 1943. Unless an abuse of discretion appears, we will not disturb a sentence within statutory limits. See State v. Escamilla, ante p. 457, 191 N.W.2d 548 (1971).

The record persuades us not to reduce the sentence. The judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. MOROSIN
(Dec 3, 1971)