Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JAMES EDWARD NETTLES, APPELLANT, v. ALFRED T. RUNDLE, WARDEN AND ARTHUR T. PRASSE, COMMISSIONER OF PRISONS.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

This action for damages under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has been brought by a state prisoner against prison authorities. It charges the defendants with negligence in connection with medical treatment requested and needed by the prisoner. The complaint also contains an allegation that medical attention was withheld because the plaintiff refused to sign a document waiving any claim for injury that might result from treatment. But this allegation is followed by a statement that, shortly after the plaintiff's refusal to sign a release, the prison authorities did provide him with medical attention. Thus, accepting the petitioner's allegations as true, we can find no more in the complaint than a charge of ordinary negligence in the course of the handling, diagnosis or treatment of the prisoner's medical complaint.

While such negligence is a tort, cognizable under state law, it does not amount to such a denial of a constitutional or federally protected right as can be redressed under the Civil Rights Act.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NETTLES v. RUNDLE
(Dec 8, 1971)