Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GEORGE C. LEWIS v. MYERS BURKE, EXECUTOR OF ESTATE OF COPELAND.

1. PROCEDURE — T.R. 53.1 (A). — The Indiana Supreme Court has determined that affirmative action by counsel or the clerk is a prerequisite to the operation of T.R. 53.1 (A). p. 598.

2. PROCEDURE — T.R. 53.1 (A) — Petitioner. — Defendant's motion to dismiss should have been ruled upon within thirty days from submission to the trial court, and the trial judge was subject to removal on and after the date thirty days from which the motion to dismiss was fully briefed and taken under advisement by the court. However, no affirmative action having been taken as prescribed in the cases of Jolly v. Modisett and Raisor v. Kelly, the jurisdiction of the trial judge continued and was operative on the date of his ruling, which was five months following the date upon which the motion was briefed and taken under advisement. p. 598.

This cause is before the Supreme Court upon praecipe of defendant (petitioner) and resultant notice from the Clerk of the Switzerland Circuit Court advising of the withdrawal of submission and requesting the Supreme Court to appoint a special judge because of undue delay in ruling upon Defendant's motion to dismiss.

PRENTICE, J.

— This cause is before us upon praecipe of Defendant (Petitioner) and the resultant notice from the Clerk of the Switzerland Circuit Court advising of the withdrawal of submission and requesting us to appoint a special judge by reason of the undue delay of the trial judge in ruling upon Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; and it is now so docketed for determination under Trial Rule 53.2 (A).

Said notice and the praecipe therefor disclose that the petitioner's motion to dismiss was filed and argued on December 1, 1970, and fully briefed and taken under advisement on January 29, 1971. It is further disclosed that said judge held said matter under advisement until June 30, 1971, upon which day said motion was overruled. Petitioner's praecipe was filed with the Clerk of the Switzerland Circuit Court on November 5, 1971.

We have recently passed upon similar questions arising under T.R. 53.1 (A) and determined that affirmative action by counsel or the Clerk is a prerequisite to the operation 1. of said rule. Jolly v. Modisett (1971), 257 Ind. 426, 275 N.E.2d 780; Raisor v. Kelly (1971), Ind., 275 N.E.2d 542. Petitioner's motion should have been ruled upon within thirty days from submission, and the trial judge was subject to removal on and after February 29, 1971. However, 2. no affirmative action having been taken as prescribed in Jolly v. Moisett, supra, and Raisor v. Kelly, supra, the jurisdiction of the trial judge continued and was operative on the date of his ruling.

Accordingly, the withdrawal of submission is hereby set aside, and the jurisdiction of the trial judge is continued.

Arterburn, C.J., and Givan and Hunter, JJ., concur; DeBruler, J., dissents.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEWIS v. BURKE, EXTR
(Jan 12, 1972)