Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HARRISON v. HARRISON.

NICHOLS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted a former husband in an action by the wife wherein she sought an increase in periodic alimony payments. The divorce decree included a contract between the parties which provided for a property settlement and monthly alimony payments to the wife. This contract, which was also attached as an exhibit to the motion for summary judgment, provided in part: "Except as herein provided, neither party shall have any claim against the other for any reason whatsoever." Held:

This language is equally as strong as the language held in Grizzard v. Grizzard, 224 Ga. 42 ( 159 S.E.2d 400) and Ferris v. Ferris, 227 Ga. 465 ( 181 S.E.2d 371), to bar any increase in monthly alimony payments. Under such decisions, the judgment of the trial court sustaining the former husband's motion for summary judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED DECEMBER 13, 1971 — DECIDED JANUARY 6, 1972 — REHEARING DENIED JANUARY 19, 1972.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HARRISON v. HARRISON
(Jan 6, 1972)