AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOHN G. OPPENHEIMER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiff commenced this civil rights action against the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, the County, various County boards and commissioners and particular officials. Thereafter he filed a "Motion for Summary Judgment, in Part," which was denied.

This appeal was taken from that denial as well as "from interlocutory orders under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)." No written statement of the district judge certifying any order for immediate appeal was made in any of the orders from which appeal is attempted to be taken, as required by Section 1292(b).

The denial of the motion is not appealable since it is not a final order under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The interlocutory orders are not appealable because the district judge did not certify them for appeal. This court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and it must be dismissed.

A prompt motion to dismiss by appellees would have eliminated time and expense both for clients, counsel and the court in these circumstances.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OPPENHEIMER v. LOS ANGELES CTY FLOOD CTRL DIST
(Feb 1, 1972)