AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

DOROTHY YARRINGTON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. BALDWIN MANOR, INC., NICHOLASCAMAROTA AND BERTRAM ROBERTS, INDIVIDUALLY AND t/a BALDWIN MANOR, ET AL.,DEFENDANTS AND THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

PER CURIAM:

The Appellate Division concluded that since there had been no damage during the period of the policy its coverage did not, under its explicit terms, extend to the occurrence set forth in the third party complaint. The particular record before us would not fairly permit any other conclusion and accordingly the Appellate Division's judgment is:

Affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and MOUNTAIN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

YARRINGTON, ET AL. v. BALDWIN MANOR, INC., ET AL
(Feb 7, 1972)