Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES A. HARRIS, Appellant.

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and GIBSON. Chief Judge FULD and Judges BREITEL and JASEN dissent and vote to modify by reversing the conviction of fraudulent accosting under former section 165.30 of the Penal Law upon the ground that the statute on which the prosecution was based was unconstitutionally vague.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HARRIS
(Feb 10, 1972)