Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF THE CITY OF CLIFTON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PASSAIC COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF THE BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, ET AL.,PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

PER CURIAM

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons expressed in its opinion ( 114 N.J. Super. 253). reasons expressed in its opinion ( 114 N.J. Super. 253).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and MOUNTAIN — 7 For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE CLIFTON v. PASSAIC CTY. BD. OF TAX
(Feb 22, 1972)