Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Joe Leyba RAMIREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

The conviction is for the possession of heroin; the punishment, ten years imprisonment.

The appellant's court-appointed counsel on appeal has filed a brief which raises no ground of error and states "Counsel further finds there is no other error upon which a non-frivolous appeal might be based." The record does not reflect that a copy of the brief was served upon the appellant as is required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969); Holder v. State, 469 S.W.2d 184 (Tex.Crim.App. 1971); Barber v. State, 471 S.W.2d 814 (Tex.Crim.App. 1971). This appeal will be abated until the record shows that there has been a compliance with the above cited authorities. See Simmons v. State, 475 S.W.2d 787 Grant, 476 S.W.2d 702 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972).

For the reasons stated, the appeal is abated.

Opinion approved by the court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RAMIREZ v. STATE
(Feb 23, 1972)