AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of the Claim of JOHN CLIPPARD, Respondent, v. COSTELLO CONCRETE CO., INC. et al., Appellants. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL and GIBSON.

Judge JASEN dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum:

In my view, on the record before us, there is no substantial evidence to sustain the board's finding of 100% loss of claimant's use of his left eye. I would reverse and remand for further proceedings to determine the extent of partial loss sustained.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF CLIPPARD v. COSTELLO CONCRETE CO. INC
(Mar 16, 1972)