Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

DANIEL T. SWEENEY, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. RAYMOND J. CANNON, as Clerk of the Court of Appeals of the State of New York, Respondent.

Order modified, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum, and, as so modified, affirmed: We agree with the Appellate Division, and for the reasons set forth in its opinion, that section 467-a of the Judiciary Law (L. 1963, ch. 204) is constitutional. However, since this is an action for a declaratory judgment, that court, instead of dismissing the complaint, should have made a declaration as to the constitutionality of the challenged section. (See, e.g., Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N.Y.2d 317, 334; Fhagen v. Miller, 36 A.D.2d 926, 927, affd. 29 N.Y.2d 348.) The order appealed from should be modified, without costs, to the extent of directing judgment in favor of defendant, declaring that section 467-a of the Judiciary Law is constitutional and, except as so modified, affirmed.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SWEENEY v. CANNON
(Mar 16, 1972)