AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LONG MANUFACTURING COMPANY, APPELLANT v. LILLISTON IMPLEMENT COMPANY, APPELLEE. LONG MANUFACTURING COMPANY, APPELLEE

PER CURIAM:

After full consideration of the briefs and oral argument, we find ourselves in agreement with the decision of the District Court that both of the appellant's patents are invalid on the ground of obviousness to persons reasonably skilled in the art. Long Manufacturing Co. v. Lilliston Implement Co., E.D.N.C., 328 F. Supp. 268.

We decline to award the attorneys fees sought by the appellee since this is not one of the "exceptional cases" to which this form of relief in patent cases is limited.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LONG MANUFACTURING CO. v. LILLISTON IMPLEMENT
(Apr 4, 1972)