Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Charles Ray HEARN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

The conviction is for burglary, enhanced under the provisions of Article 62, Vernon's Ann.P.C.; the punishment, twelve years imprisonment.

The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal of this case and the motion is supported by proper proof that after the record on appeal was filed in this court, appellant escaped from custody and did not voluntarily return to custody within ten days. This court is without jurisdiction except to dismiss the appeal. See Articles 44.09 and 44.10, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P.; Cuevas v. State, 467 S.W.2d 421 (Tex.Cr.App. 1971); Rinehart v. State, 456 S.W.2d 396 (Tex.Cr.App. 1970); Vaughn v. State, 456 S.W.2d 141 (Tex.Cr.App. 1970); Forder v. State, 456 S.W.2d 378 (Tex.Cr.App. 1970); Fonseca v. State, 455 S.W.2d 244 (Tex.Cr.App. 1970).

The State's motion to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HEARN v. STATE
(Apr 12, 1972)