Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FRANCIS X. MORIN, JR., ET AL. APPEAL OF ALBERT LaMOLINARE.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

The alleged objectionable statements in the jury instructions asserted for the first time in this court could have been easily remedied by the Trial Judge by simple curative language. Instead of raising these objections voiced in the district court, counsel for appellant expressed himself as "satisfied" with the charge. We can perceive no basis for sustaining the appeal on this issue.

United States v. Chicarelli, 445 F.2d 1111 (3 Cir. 1971).

There is sufficient evidence from which the jury could have inferred that the appellant was an aider and abettor in the Pittsburgh National Bank robbery. 18 U.S.C. § 2. This ground also is ineffectual. United States v. Bradley, 447 F.2d 657, 659-660 (3 Cir. 1971).

We perceive no reversible error in this record. The judgment of conviction will be affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. MORIN
(Apr 12, 1972)