AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of FRANK H. MAURIZIO et al., on Behalf of Themsel v. s and All Others Similarly Situated, Respondents,

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County entered on March 26, 1971, confirming the report of the Special Referee with reference to rating examination papers of certain civil service workers, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of remanding the matter to the respondents for reconsideration, and as so modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The duty of establishing the requirements for the promotional examination is conferred on the respondents alone, and may not be interfered with by the courts if fairly exercised. The omission of the respondents to participate in this appeal might well imply conformance with the views of Special Term. Nevertheless, the courts may not exercise the power or discharge the duty of the respondents. ( Matter of Wirzberger v. Watson, 305 N.Y. 507.)

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Nunez, Murphy, McNally and Capozzoli, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF MAURIZIO v. HOBERMAN
(Apr 11, 1972)