UNITED STATES v. DE SMET

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 71-2811.

Attorney(S)

Joel Shawn (argued), of Lukes Bassoni, San Francisco,
, for
Stephen E. Clark (argued), of Athearn, Chandler, Hoffman, James L. Browning, Jr., U.S.
, San Francisco,
, for plaintiff-

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 71-2811.

Attorney(S)

Joel Shawn (argued), of Lukes Bassoni, San Francisco,
, for
Stephen E. Clark (argued), of Athearn, Chandler, Hoffman, James L. Browning, Jr., U.S.
, San Francisco,
, for plaintiff-

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, v. JOEL MARK DE SMET, APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.

We decide here that if there was some irregularity in the "call" process, there is no evidence of prejudice to De Smet.

However, we reject the contention that there was irregularity in the "calling."

Use AI to get other relevant cases.