Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARK ALLEN DWORKIN, MARILYN DWORKIN, RHONA C. REISER and EUGENE HAMOND, Appellants.

MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division denying the motion to suppress should be affirmed upon the ground that defendants have failed to demonstrate that the marijuana found in their automobile during the course of a border search must be declared inadmissible as the product of an unconstitutional search.

Border searches need not be based on probable cause and customs officials are privileged to stop and examine any vehicle, person or baggage entering the United States (see, e.g., Carroll

Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. DWORKIN, REISER, HAMOND
(Apr 26, 1972)