Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JOHN WILLIAM BULLOCK ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.

Appellant contended that: 1) the evidence was insufficient for the jury to have inferred the existence of an unlawful agreement; 2) there was improper venue and a lack of jurisdiction; 3) the charge did not sufficiently instruct the jury to consider each defendant separately; and 4) a preliminary instruction to the jury that once there is some evidence of conspiracy, hearsay of co-conspirators may be admissible, amounted to an instruction, as a matter of law, that there was evidence of a conspiracy. We have considered all these specifications of error and find them to be without merit.

See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5 Cir. 1970).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. BULLOCK
(May 1, 1972)