Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIE STRODE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus by a prisoner incarcerated pursuant to a state conviction. On August 12, 1971 the district court entered an order stating that it was allowing an appeal, which we construe to mean granting a certificate of probable cause under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, stating that it did so because of the policy of this circuit to allow such an appeal regardless of its merit.

There is no such policy of this circuit. Section 2253 provides that an appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas proceeding where the detention is under state process unless the habeas judge or a circuit judge or the circuit justice issues a certificate of probable cause. Implementing this, Rule 22(b), FRAP, provides that if the district court denies a certificate of probable cause the applicant may seek a certificate in the Court of Appeals. In 1970, for example, there were 133 applications for certificates of probable cause in this circuit in cases where certificates had been denied by the district judges. Of these, 112 were denied and 21 were granted.

On December 23, 1971, apparently having become aware that his prior understanding was a misapprehension, the district judge entered an order vacating his grant of a certificate of probable cause. However, by that date the record had been lodged in this court and briefs had been filed and the case was ready for submission. In view of the status of the case and in the interest of judicial administration we treat the revocation of the certificate of probable cause as of no effect and reach the merits. Having considered the merits, the district court's denial of the writ is affirmed.

PER CURIAM:

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STRODE v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
(May 17, 1972)