Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. WILLIAM RANDOLPH, JR., AKA CLARENCE RANDOLPH, AKA BOBBY MOORE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this passing counterfeit currency case is affirmed.

We reject the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. There are many scraps of evidence, each of which alone means little, put together they could mean a lot to a jury.

On the facts here, disbelief of Randolph's testimony could lead to some affirmative inferences of knowledge.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. RANDOLPH
(May 26, 1972)