Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment.
BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
TATE, J., dissents. Although under our practice we do not normally review purely factual determinations, this writ should be granted since this decision is in direct conflict with our recent decision in Williams v. Hudson East, 261 La. 959, 261 So.2d 629.