Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. DONALD WAYNE QUIGLEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM:

Quigley was charged with and convicted of passing and selling counterfeit currency in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472.

His attack upon the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the charge of "selling" is without merit. The government was not required to prove both passing and selling, even though the indictment so charged. Cf. Arellanes v. United States, 302 F.2d 603, 609 (CA9 1962), cert. denied 371 U.S. 930, 83 S.Ct. 294, 9 L.Ed.2d 238 (1962); United States v. Carter, 454 F.2d 525 (CA9 1972); McGriff v. United States, 408 F.2d 333, 334 (CA9 1969).

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. QUIGLEY
(Jul 17, 1972)