Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PEOPLE v. McINTOSH

FITZGERALD, P.J.

Defendant was convicted, upon a plea of guilty, of committing larceny in a building, a violation of MCLA 750.360; MSA 28.592. He appeals as of right.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in taking into consideration defendant's juvenile court record in imposing sentence. In light of recent decisions of this Court, we agree that this was error. MCLA 712A.23; MSA 27.3178(598.23); and People v. McFarlin, 41 Mich. App. 116 (1972).

Because the trial court is at this point aware of defendant's juvenile record and we would have no way of knowing if the resentencing process would be affected by this knowledge, we direct that a new presentence report which excludes reference to defendant's juvenile record be obtained and that defendant be resentenced by a judge other than the sentencing judge herein.

The resolution set forth above renders the other issue raised by defendant moot.

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

T.M. BURNS, J., concurred.

HOLBROOK, J. (for affirmance).

This writer is unable to agree with the majority opinion for reversal for the reasons stated in Justice O'HARA'S opinion in which this writer concurred in the case of People v. Pence, 42 Mich. App. 215 (1972).

I would affirm the trial court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. McINTOSH
(Aug 30, 1972)