Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

YOUNG v. STATE OF MARYLAND

STATUTES — CONTINUANCE — New Procedure For Obtaining Continuances Effective July 1, 1971 Would Apply To Criminal Cases Pending As Of July 1, 1971 And Proper Procedure To Be Followed In Granting Of All Continuances And Postponements Would Be Those Consonant With Newly Enacted Statute. pp. 438-439

CRIMINAL LAW — CONTINUANCE — Speedy Trial — Procedure To Be Followed With Respect To Continuances And Postponements In Accordance With Code, Article 27, § 591 Is Directory And Not Mandatory Therefore Dismissal For Non-Compliance Alone Is Not Provided For — Non-Compliance With Sec. 591 Is A Single Factor To Be Considered With All Factors In Determining Whether A Defendant Has Been Denied His Right To A Speedy Trial. pp. 438-439

(See opinion 15 Md. App. 707 (1972).)

PER CURIAM:

This Court, having granted a writ of certiorari and in accordance with Maryland Rule 811 b having determined that no error of law appears in the decision, adopts the opinion of Judge Moylan for the Court of Special Appeals in Young v. State, 15 Md. App. 707 and affirms the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

YOUNG v. STATE
(Sep 12, 1972)